The Math of Less
Why this week’s biggest breakthroughs all worked by taking things away, and what a fringe philosophy of mathematics has to do with any of it. Copyright: Sanjay Basu F or most of the last decade, the headlines in physics, AI, and computing have all rhymed with the same dull tune. More. More parameters. More qubits. More compute. More data. More layers. More floors on the same skyscraper, and another floor again next quarter, because what else are you going to put in a press release. But this week, four very different research stories shared an unsettling subtext, and it is the opposite one. The next jump forward might come from doing brilliantly less. From a Caltech team showing that a useful quantum computer needs ten thousand qubits instead of a million, to a Google paper that crushes a transformer’s memory using a forty-year-old trick from pure mathematics, science is having a quiet subtractive moment. And tucked behind it, almost embarrassed to be there, is a philosopher’s question ...